:: Pseudo-canonical Formulae are Classical
:: by Marco B. Caminati and Artur Korni{\l}owicz
::
:: Received May 25, 2014
:: Copyright (c) 2014-2017 Association of Mizar Users
:: (Stowarzyszenie Uzytkownikow Mizara, Bialystok, Poland).
:: This code can be distributed under the GNU General Public Licence
:: version 3.0 or later, or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
:: License version 3.0 or later, subject to the binding interpretation
:: detailed in file COPYING.interpretation.
:: See COPYING.GPL and COPYING.CC-BY-SA for the full text of these
:: licenses, or see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html and
:: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/.
environ
vocabularies TARSKI, XBOOLE_0, ZFMISC_1, SUBSET_1, NUMBERS, NAT_1, RELAT_1,
FUNCT_1, XCMPLX_0, PARTFUN1, PBOOLE, FUNCT_4, OPOSET_1, FUNCOP_1,
FOMODEL0, MCART_1, ABIAN, HILBERT1, HILBERT2, HILBERT3, XBOOLEAN,
QC_LANG1, FUNCT_2, CARD_1, RELAT_2, HILBERT4;
notations TARSKI, XBOOLE_0, SUBSET_1, ZFMISC_1, ORDINAL1, NUMBERS, RELAT_1,
FUNCT_1, RELSET_1, PARTFUN1, XXREAL_0, PBOOLE, FUNCT_4, PARTIT_2,
XTUPLE_0, HILBERT1, HILBERT2, FUNCT_2, ABIAN, HILBERT3, FUNCT_3,
DOMAIN_1, RELAT_2, XCMPLX_0, FUNCOP_1, BINOP_1, FOMODEL0;
constructors SETFAM_1, FUNCT_4, PARTIT_2, BORSUK_7, ABIAN, HILBERT1, HILBERT2,
FUNCT_2, MSUALG_3, RELAT_2, HILBERT3, FOMODEL0, NAT_D, FUNCT_3, RELSET_1,
BINOP_1;
registrations FOMODEL0, HILBERT3, FUNCT_1, FUNCT_2, FUNCT_4, ORDINAL1,
RELAT_1, RELAT_2, RELSET_1, SUBSET_1, XBOOLE_0, XTUPLE_0, ZFMISC_1,
FUNCOP_1, XREAL_0, PARTIT_2, FUNCTOR1, CARD_1;
requirements NUMERALS, SUBSET, BOOLE;
begin
reserve
a,b,c,x,y,z,A,B,C,X,Y for set,
f,g for Function,
V for SetValuation,
P for Permutation of V,
p,q,r,s for Element of HP-WFF,
n for Element of NAT;
registration
let X,Y;
let f be Relation of X,Y;
reduce (id X) * f to f;
reduce f * (id Y) to f;
end;
theorem :: HILBERT4:1
for f,g being one-to-one Function st f" = g" holds f = g;
registration
cluster involutive for Function;
let A;
cluster involutive for Permutation of A;
end;
theorem :: HILBERT4:2
for f being involutive Function st rng f c= dom f holds
f*f = id dom f;
theorem :: HILBERT4:3
for f being Function st f*f = id dom f holds f is involutive;
theorem :: HILBERT4:4
for f being involutive Function of A,A holds f*f = id A;
theorem :: HILBERT4:5
for f being Function of A,A st f*f = id A holds f is involutive;
registration
cluster involutive -> one-to-one for Function;
end;
registration
let A;
let f be involutive Permutation of A;
cluster f" -> involutive;
end;
registration
let n be non zero Nat;
cluster (0,n) --> (n,0) -> without_fixpoints;
end;
registration
let n be non zero Nat, z be zero Nat;
cluster fixpoints ((z,n) --> (n,z)) -> empty;
end;
registration
let X be non empty set;
cluster non empty involutive for Permutation of X;
end;
registration
let A,B;
let f be involutive Function of A,A;
let g be involutive Function of B,B;
cluster [:f,g:] -> involutive;
end;
registration
let A,B be non empty set;
let f be involutive Permutation of A, g be involutive Permutation of B;
cluster f => g -> involutive;
end;
begin ::# Facts about Perm's fixed points
theorem :: HILBERT4:6
x is_a_fixpoint_of Perm(P,q) implies
SetVal(V,p) --> x is_a_fixpoint_of Perm(P,p=>q);
theorem :: HILBERT4:7
Perm(P,q) is with_fixpoint implies Perm(P,p=>q) is with_fixpoint;
theorem :: HILBERT4:8
Perm(P,p) is with_fixpoint & Perm(P,q) is without_fixpoints implies
Perm(P,p=>q) is without_fixpoints;
begin
::# Axiom of choice in functional form via Fr\{ae}nkel operator
::# It is used to arbitrarily partition the field of a function f
::# into three parts, one of which is made of the fixpoints.
::# We will use this construction in Lm100 for the case of f
::# being a permutation, hence some elementary properties are shown
::# for that case.
definition
let X be set;
func ChoiceOn X -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 1
{[x, the Element of x] where x is Element of X\{{}}: x in X\{{}}};
end;
registration
let X be set;
cluster ChoiceOn X -> Relation-like Function-like;
end;
definition
::# When f is a permutation, call each {x, f.x} a switchpair.
::# In that case, FieldCover
::# covers the permuted set with the set of (unordered) switchpairs.
let f;
func FieldCover f -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 2
{{x,f.x} where x is Element of dom f: x in dom f};
end;
definition
::# When f is a permutation, we arbitrarily choose one element of the
::# switchpair.
::# Except that we are avoiding fixpoints:
::# switchpairs become singletons
::# exactly in the case of fixpoints,
::# hence the latter never belong to SomePoints.
let f;
func SomePoints f -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 3
(field f) \ rng ChoiceOn FieldCover f;
end;
definition
::# Again, we restrict our comments to the case of f being a permutation.
::# Then, by construction, we are splitting its domain into three subsets:
::# that of fixpoints, and two arbitrary "halves"
::# (called SomePoints and OtherPoints) of the remaining points.
let f;
func OtherPoints f -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 4
((field f) \ (fixpoints f)) \ (SomePoints f);
end;
registration
let g;
cluster (OtherPoints g) /\ SomePoints g -> empty;
end;
begin
::# Building the needed SetValuation (tohilbval), and the
::# needed permutation of it, called tohilbperm.
::# They are specifically built so to enjoy the right fixpoints properties
::# in order to prove the main theorem (Lm100).
definition
let x;
::# Constructive definition of the object uniquely described by Lm17 & Lm18
func x tohilb -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 5
(id 1) +*
([:1, Funcs(x,{}):] * [:Funcs(x,{}),{1}:]) +*
([:{1}, Funcs(x,{}):] * [:Funcs(x,{}),{0}:]);
end;
registration
let x;
cluster x tohilb -> Function-like Relation-like;
end;
theorem :: HILBERT4:9
x<>{} implies x tohilb=id 1;
theorem :: HILBERT4:10
{} tohilb = (0,1) --> (1,0);
definition
let v be Function;
func v tohilbperm -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 6
the set of all [n, v.n tohilb] where n is Element of NAT;
end;
definition
let v be Function;
func v tohilbval -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 7
the set of all [n, dom (v.n tohilb)] where n is Element of NAT;
end;
registration let v be Function;
cluster v tohilbval -> Function-like Relation-like;
cluster v tohilbperm -> Function-like Relation-like;
cluster v tohilbval -> NAT-defined;
cluster v tohilbval -> total;
cluster v tohilbperm -> NAT-defined;
cluster v tohilbperm -> total;
end;
registration
let v be Function;
cluster v tohilbval -> non-empty;
end;
registration let x;
cluster x tohilb -> symmetric;
end;
definition
let v be Function;
redefine func v tohilbperm -> Permutation of v tohilbval;
end;
definition
mode SetValuation0 is ManySortedSet of NAT;
end;
reserve v for SetValuation0;
registration
let p,v;
cluster Perm (v tohilbperm,p) -> involutive;
end;
begin
::# Classical semantics via SetVal0, an extension of SetVal.
::# Thus, we can state and prove the main result:
::# pseudo-canonical implies classical.
definition
let V be SetValuation0;
func SetVal0 V -> ManySortedSet of HP-WFF means
:: HILBERT4:def 8
it.VERUM = 1 & (for n holds it.prop n = V.n) &
for p,q holds
it.(p '&' q) = [:it.p, it.q:] & it.(p =>q) = Funcs(it.p,it.q);
end;
definition
let v,p;
func SetVal0(v,p) -> set equals
:: HILBERT4:def 9
(SetVal0 v).p;
end;
definition
let p;
attr p is classical means
:: HILBERT4:def 10
SetVal0 (v,p) <> {};
::# The idea is that the three set-theoretical entities
::# {}, [:,:], Funcs
::# behave respectively like
::# 0, AND, =>
::# of classical logic.
::# For example Funcs(x,y)={} iff (x<>{}, y={}). And so on...
::# To enforce this scheme, a slight modification of SetValuation into
::# the ancestor mode SetValuation0, allowing empty truth values, was needed.
::# Initially, the immaterial restriction of 2-valuedness was considered
::# to ease the work; however, upon rethinking tohilb definition, it
::# was no longer needed.
end;
registration
cluster pseudo-canonical -> classical for Element of HP-WFF;
end;
registration
let v;
let p be classical Element of HP-WFF;
cluster SetVal0 (v,p) -> non empty;
end;